comparison
Kodak Ektar 100 vs Fuji Velvia 50
Maximum saturation, with or without latitude.
The same photograph, same exposure, both looks at full strength. See the untouched original.
The difference
The two most saturated films in this collection, from opposite sides of the negative/slide divide. Velvia has more contrast and clips highlights abruptly; Ektar keeps a negative film's highlight latitude while getting most of the way to Velvia's intensity. Velvia leans green and red, Ektar leans blue and red. For a bright sky you cannot afford to lose, Ektar is the safer route to the same energy.
Which to use
Ektar 100
When highlights matter and you still want the colour loud.
Velvia 50
When you want the most saturated result possible and will expose for it.
Side by side
| Kodak Ektar 100 | Fuji Velvia 50 | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | colour negative | slide |
| Maker | Kodak | Fujifilm |
| Speed | ISO 100 | ISO 50 |
| Produced | 2008–present | 1990–present |
| Renderings here | 1 | 1 |
| Download | .cube | .cube |
Try Kodak Ektar 100 on your photo → Try Fuji Velvia 50
A comparison on somebody else's reference photograph only tells you so much. Both of these render on your image in the tool, alongside the other 294.